Author Topic: time recording  (Read 466 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline flying-apple

  • Posts: 6
time recording
« on: Friday February 26, 2010, 05:35:28 UTC »
Greetings all

some advise please,  how do most people record time when flying a chippie.  Should one install a hobbs meter of some type or just look at the watch on start or takeoff???

(yes it is a give away that i am used to flying spamcans)

thank you in advance



Brian Appleton

Offline Janie

  • Posts: 31
Re: time recording
« Reply #1 on: Monday March 01, 2010, 00:04:51 UTC »
My own Chipmunk does not have a Hobbs.  We record time from take-off to landing.  Other syndicates measure in different ways.  Often from engine on to engine off so that the true engine time is recorded.

I have flown Chipmunks with Hobbs meters.  It is entirely up to yourself.

Which Chippy do you fly?
It is written 'de Havilland' - not De Havilland, DeHavilland, De-Havilland or de Haviland.  Spread the word.

Offline flying-apple

  • Posts: 6
Re: time recording
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday March 02, 2010, 18:14:09 UTC »
Thanks for your reply Janie

I have WP-871

will probally get a vibration hobbs, 

warm greetings

Brian

Offline andrewjherbert

  • Posts: 19
Re: time recording
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday March 02, 2010, 21:05:49 UTC »
Brakes on to brakes off builds hours faster in your log book.  Take-off to landing  reduces the rate at which you consume engine and fatigue hours, and really taxying doesn't contribute as much wear and tear as time at full / cruise throttle.

Have you read the relvant TNS (138?) about how to calculate fatigue hours and the lifetime of critical components.  This is important to get right. 

My Chippie (WZ879) came with complete RAF records include a fatigue calculation that gave fewer hours than if I applied the default 2.5 multiplier to total hours which gaves me a longer interval until major interventions are needed.

My  Chippie has a stop watch holder in each cockpit and my GPS/Com can be programmed to track time in motion so I use these as my "Hobbs".

Andrew Herbert

Offline Bob

  • Posts: 162
    • http://www.dhchipmunk.com
Re: time recording
« Reply #4 on: Tuesday March 02, 2010, 22:57:27 UTC »
We have a Hobbs in MT, it can be a pain if you get caught in a 30 min wait at the hold  :wink:

Offline flying-apple

  • Posts: 6
Re: time recording
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday March 03, 2010, 15:49:00 UTC »
Dear Andrew

I like the idea of programing the gps for time in motion, actually just purchesed the new area 500 for the chippie (small and flat) Hope this function is available.

Yes, sitting at the holding point watching the hobbs tick by can really tick one off, I think this is how a lot of flying schools make money.

thanks for the replies

Greetings from sunny South Africa

Offline Dick Gower

  • Posts: 59
Re: time recording
« Reply #6 on: Thursday May 27, 2010, 13:14:41 UTC »
I think the lack of a Hobbs or similar is why they are always advertised with 500 hours to run!

Andrew, how did the Area 500 go in your Chippy?  I hear they have a great internal antenna.

Regards,
Dick
Dick Gower
Melbourne,
Australia.

Offline andrewjherbert

  • Posts: 19
Re: time recording
« Reply #7 on: Friday May 28, 2010, 11:22:23 UTC »
Hi Dick

I fitted a Garmin GNC250XL GPS/COM box to replace an older NARCO radio in a small stack with a transponder mounted between the floor and the instrument panel in front of the control stick. 

The GNC250XL only gives me a small letter box shaped monochrone image rather than a moving map etc, but it is good enough to give me a line to follow to a selected destination (airfield, beacon, intersection), to show me controlled airspace boundaries and time to waypoint.  For anything else I revert to Mk 1 eyeball.  (It's also good enough for me to fake a VOR/Locator/DME approach should I ever paint myself in that particular corner....)

The antenna is a small blister that fitted on the fuselage just in front of the windscreen.  It's reasonably unobtrusive.

FWIW I also fitted a Garmin GTX 328 transponder which has an easier interface - to select 1234 you punch the "1" button, then the "2" button etc.  Much easier than heads down twiddling rotary knobs for each digit on the older NARCO unit it replaced (and also added mode S).

In terms of the discussion Hobbs vs Brakes on/off time I put brakes on/off time in my personal log book and generally record engine and airframe time as brakes time less 10 minutes to allow for warm up and taxy.  If I find myself with a long ground hold I take this off too.  My rationale is from brakes on to off I'm execising my responsibility as a pilot, but engine and airframe life only applies to time in the air.


If you use Hobbs time for computing costs there is an incentive to rush through engine warm up and taxy around a breakneck speed, neither of which is good for you or your Chipmunk.

Cheers

Andrew

Offline Dick Gower

  • Posts: 59
Re: time recording
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday July 14, 2010, 12:57:30 UTC »
Could not agree more about the rushed checks with logging engine time.

It looks as though different countries have varying ways of recording times.  In Australia maintenance is by airframe time (wheels off to wheels on) an loggable pilot time is officially brakes off to on.

Then there is Hobbs (oil pressure) time which flying schools charge on and most pilots actually log.

Dick Gower
Melbourne,
Australia.